Journal cover Journal topic
Drinking Water Engineering and Science An interactive open-access journal
Journal topic

Journal metrics

CiteScore value: 2.2
CiteScore
2.2
SNIP value: 0.828
SNIP0.828
SJR value: 0.391
SJR0.391
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 16
Scimago H
index
16
Download

This preprint has been retracted.

Short summary
In this study, the final results of FLOW-3D numerical model results were compared with experimental results and the SSIIM model results. With the aim of quantitative investigation of bed changes result, experimental and software result were compared in transverse and longitudinal sections. The results show that FLOW-3D model is more accurate than SSIIM model, while in the high discharge, FLOW-3D model accuracy is very low and unacceptable.
Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/dwes-2017-21
https://doi.org/10.5194/dwes-2017-21

  08 Jun 2017

08 Jun 2017

Status: this preprint has been retracted.

Numerical scour modeling around parallel spur dikes in FLOW-3D

Hanif Pourshahbaz1, Saeed Abbasi1, and poorya taghvaei2 Hanif Pourshahbaz et al.
  • 1Department of Civil Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
  • 2Department of Civil Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

Abstract. Spur dikes are some structures which are built in the flow path with the aim of changing flow characteristics in order to bed and bank protection in rivers. These sudden changes in properties caused by the existence of spur dikes, produces erosion and sedimentation around them. In this paper, effects of series of parallel spur dikes have been investigated numerically. For this purpose, by using experimental and numerical research results from technical literatures, the numerical model conducted in FLOW-3D commercial software and the data were compared with experimental and SSIIM results. The results showed that Froude number and the ratio of U/Ucr affect the accuracy of the models. As a result, by discharge increasing, FLOW-3D models need to be calibrated again. Also, by using a calibrated FLOW-3D model, calculation accuracy of the scour depth at the bottom of the spur dikes becomes better and the accuracy level in the modeling of the surface morphology improves 7 percent more than SSIIM software in the bottom of the first spur dike, more than 80 percent at the bottom of the second spur dike and approximately 40 percent at the bottom of the last spur dike.

This preprint has been retracted.

Hanif Pourshahbaz et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Hanif Pourshahbaz et al.

Hanif Pourshahbaz et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,449 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
844 569 36 1,449 70 66
  • HTML: 844
  • PDF: 569
  • XML: 36
  • Total: 1,449
  • BibTeX: 70
  • EndNote: 66
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Jun 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Jun 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,390 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,377 with geography defined and 13 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 07 Mar 2021
Publications Copernicus
Download
Retraction notice

This preprint has been retracted.

Short summary
In this study, the final results of FLOW-3D numerical model results were compared with experimental results and the SSIIM model results. With the aim of quantitative investigation of bed changes result, experimental and software result were compared in transverse and longitudinal sections. The results show that FLOW-3D model is more accurate than SSIIM model, while in the high discharge, FLOW-3D model accuracy is very low and unacceptable.
Citation