References

DWESD

Drinking Water Engineering and Science Discussions

DWESD

Drink. Water Eng. Sci. Discuss.

1996-9481

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/dwesd-5-209-2012

Water investment in Mexico City: contradictory elements preventing investment efficiency

Marquez-Dorantes

M. J.

School of International Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK

07 06 2012

5 1 209 223

2012

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This article is available from https://dwes.copernicus.org/preprints/5/209/2012/dwesd-5-209-2012.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://dwes.copernicus.org/preprints/5/209/2012/dwesd-5-209-2012.pdf

The complex connections between environmental and socio-economic variables in the water sector system involve not only ecological changes such as climate change but also a need for changes in socio-economic arenas to reduce the impacts of climate change. It is necessary not only to acknowledge the elements of change but also to understand the constraints preventing change in specific cases. The challenges faced by the water sector in Mexico City, as the world's second largest urban agglomeration with its fast growing population, limited external water sources, depleted aquifers and increased disaster risks, call for urgent measures to resolve the inefficiencies found in the traditional approach to water investment. This paper explores how far the multiple objectives of different actors involved in water projects are balanced to attain integrated water management. The Santa Catarina Water Supply Project, which is in a highly contentious area because of the limited availability of drinking water, is presented as a case study. The analysis shows that the multiple objectives of the different actors involved, together with an institutional structure that perpetuates a traditional engineering approach, constrain the effective and efficient delivery of water projects. The institutional analysis development framework (Ostrom, 2006) is used to analyse the arena of investment decision-making in water for Mexico City. Following the notion of institutional arrangements as "incentives and deterrents" (Ostrom, 1976), eight contradictory elements are proposed to illustrate the process by which institutional arrangements, implemented by specific actors with the intention of producing specific outcomes, are inefficient in delivering the expected outcomes, and can even produce negative ones when interacting with other existing formal and informal arrangements determined by other actors. These elements explain both the resilience of the system, which has so far prevented its collapse, and the magnitude of a growing problem that demands change.

References 1

Burns, E. (Ed.): Repensar la Cuenca. La gestión de ciclos del agua en el Valle de México, Mexico, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, 2009.

Chevalier, J.: Stakeholder Analysis and Natural Resource Management, Ottawa, Carleton University, 2001.

Comisión Nacional del Agua (CNA): Cubo de Población, Vivienda y Agua, available at: <a href="http://www.conagua.gob.mx">http://www.conagua.gob.mx</a>, last access: 3 September 2009, 2008.

Grimble, R. and Wellard, K.: Stakeholder Methodologies in Natural Resource Management: A Review of Principles, Contexts, Experiences and Opportunities, Agr. Syst., 55, 173–193, 1997.

Horna, N. and Cota Ozuna, R.: Fuentes de Abastecimiento de Aguas del Distrito Federal, Finanzas y administración del agua en el Distrito Federal, Asamblea Legislativa del Distrito Federal/III Legislatura, Asamblea Legislativa del Distrito Federal, Mexico City, Mexico, 2004.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática (INEGI): II Conteo de Población y Vivienda 2005, Mexico, 2005.

Koudstaal, R., Nooy, C., and Paranjpye, V. (Eds.): Involving Communities: A Guide to the Negotiated Approach., Both ENDS, Gomukh, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Pune, India, 2011.

Ley Orgánica de la Administración Pública Federal (LOAPF): Diario Oficial de la Federación, DOF 17-06-2009, 1998.

Ostrom, E.: The Delivery of Urban Services: Outcomes of Change, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, London, 1976.

Ostrom, E.: The Institutional Analysis and Development Framework in Historical Perspective, Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott, Loews Philadelphia, and the Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia, 2006.

Pahl-Wostl, C.: Information, Public Empowerment, and the Management of Urban Watersheds, Environ. Modell. Softw., 20, 457–467, 2005.

Saravanan, V. S.: A Systems Approach to Unravel Complex Water Management Institutions, Ecol. Complex., 5, 202–215, 2008.

Secretaría de Agricultura y Recursos Hidráulicos (SARH): Sistema Cutzamala Segunda Etapa. Captación Valle de Bravo, Mexico, 1985.

Secretaría de Desarrollo Económico (SEDECO)/SIEGE: Desarrollo Humano por Delegación, available at: <a href="http://www.siege.df.gob.mx/">http://www.siege.df.gob.mx/</a>, last access: 3 September 2009, 2000.

Sistema de Aguas de la Ciudad de México (SACM): Programa de Manejo Sustentable del Agua para la Ciudad de México, Gobierno del Distrito Federal (GDF), Secretaría del Medio Ambiente (SMA), Secretaría de Obras y Servicios (SOS), Sistema de Aguas de la Ciudad de México (SACM), Mexico City, Mexico, 2007.

Sistema de Aguas de la Ciudad de México (SACM): Supply of 500 Liters per Second in the Zone of Santa Catarina and San Lorenzo: Executive Summary (internal document), Sistema de Aguas de la Ciudad de México (SACM), Mexico City, Mexico, available at: <a href="http://www.finanzas.df.gob.mx/presupuestal/detalleProyectos/079010010\20Catarina\20San%20Lorenzo.pdf">http://www.finanzas.df.gob.mx/presupuestal/detalleProyectos/079010010\20Catarina\20San%20Lorenzo.pdf</a>, 2009.

Solo, T. M., Perez, E., and Joyce, S.: Water and Sanitation Services to the Urban Poor, WASH Technical Report 85, Office of Health, Bureau for Research and Development, US Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, 1993.

Starkl, M., Brunner, N., Flögl, W., and Wimmer, J.: Desi gn of an Institutional Decision-Making Process: The Case of Urban Water Management, J. Environ. Manage., 90, 1030–1042, 2009.

Stiglitz, J. E.: Economics of the Public Sector, W.W. Norton, New York, 2000.

United Nations (UN): 2005 Demographic Yearbook, United Nations, New York, 2005.

Vairavamoorthy, K., Gorantiwar, S. D., and Mohan, S.: Intermittent Water Supply under Water Scarcity Situations, Water Int., 32, 121–132, 2007.

Wilder, M. and Romero Lankao, P.: Paradoxes of Decentralization: Water Reform and Social Implications in Mexico, World Dev., 34, 1977–1995, 2006.

World Bank (WB): Climate Change, Disaster Risk, and the Urban Poor: Cities Building Resilience for a Changing World, World Bank, Washington D.C., 2011.