Journal cover Journal topic
Drinking Water Engineering and Science An interactive open-access journal
Journal topic

Journal metrics

CiteScore value: 2.2
SNIP value: 0.828
SJR value: 0.391
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 16
Scimago H
Volume 2, issue 2
Drink. Water Eng. Sci., 2, 57–62, 2009
© Author(s) 2009. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: HQw '09 – Removal of organics

Drink. Water Eng. Sci., 2, 57–62, 2009
© Author(s) 2009. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

  22 Dec 2009

22 Dec 2009

Development of a predictive model to determine micropollutant removal using granular activated carbon

D. J. de Ridder1, M. McConville1, A. R. D. Verliefde1,2,4, L. T. J. van der Aa1,3, S. G. J. Heijman1, J. Q. J. C. Verberk1, L. C. Rietveld1,3, and J. C. van Dijk1 D. J. de Ridder et al.
  • 1Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
  • 2UNESCO Centre for Membrane Science & Technology, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Sydney, Australia
  • 3Waternet, P.O. Box 94370, 1090 GJ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • 4KWR Watercycle Research Institute, P.O. Box 1072, 3430BB Nieuwegein, The Netherlands

Abstract. The occurrence of organic micropollutants in drinking water and its sources has opened up a field of study related to monitoring concentration levels in water sources, evaluating their toxicity and estimating their removal in drinking water treatment processes. Because a large number of organic micropollutants is currently present (although in relatively low concentrations) in drinking water sources, a method should be developed to select which micropollutants has to be evaluated with priority. In this paper, a screening model is presented that can predict solute removal by activated carbon, in ultrapure water and in natural water. Solute removal prediction is based on a combination of solute hydrophobicity (expressed as log D, the pH corrected log Kow), solute charge and the carbon dose. Solute molecular weight was also considered as model input parameter, but this solute property appeared to relate insufficiently to solute removal.

Removal of negatively charged solutes by preloaded activated carbon was reduced while the removal of positively charged solutes was increased, compared with freshly regenerated activated carbon. Differences in charged solute removal by freshly regenerated activated carbon were small, indicating that charge interactions are an important mechanism in adsorption onto preloaded carbon. The predicted solute removal was within 20 removal-% deviation of experimentally measured values for most solutes.

Publications Copernicus